admiraldev is a set of tools intended for you, the developer, to help make developing within the admiral family easier, consistently robust across all packages and maybe even fun!
Tools are loosely defined as follows:
Utility Functions used in admiral and
admiral extension packages for doing custom checks and
providing custom messages, warnings and errors. These custom messages,
warnings and errors are succinct, but helpful messaging around what a
function expects as inputs. The inputs to admiral functions are many,
but generally fit into three categories: datasets, variables and
arguments. Most of the functions start with assert_
,
is_
or get_
.
A roclet extending the standard roxygen2 roclet:
@permitted
tag is provided to document the
permitted values for an argument.@default
tag.@caption
, @info
, and
@code
tags can be used to create a better structured
example section. They allow to add a caption and TOC entry for each
example and a description of the example.See rdx_roclet()
, the example function
demo_fun()
, and Function Header Documentation in our
Programming Strategy for more details.
Utility functions that help with documentation, testing and checking on health of the code base in all admiral packages.
Vignettes on working on admiral functions, developing unit testing, releases process, vignette writing and other documentation needs. These vignettes are intended for use across all admiral packages.
As the admiral package function base has grown it was decided to create extension packages for use within companies and specific TAs to help with specific problems. We intended these extension packages to follow the same processes as admiral core, e.g. Unit Testing, Roxygen Documentation, Function Design. A standalone development package allows us to keep an up to date development process for all developers across the family. We also feel that a lot of the developer functions are not user-specific and gives us more freedom to create and release utility tools specific to our family of packages and reduces non-user facing functions within the admiral family of packages.
{admiraldev}
?
Just like in admiral, we follow the same procedures of adding issues to discuss feature requests, bugs and documentation updates. We then develop those issues in branches and do a Pull Request with a Code Review.
Experimental tools are highly encouraged to help reduce repetitive patterns and automating the boring stuff.
{admiraldev}
?
A developer working on admiral core implements a new
type of derivation function for a BDS-Findings ADaM dataset. The new
derivation function has two new assert
custom checking
functions for inputs as well as a helper function.
Loose guidelines:
assert
custom checking functions should always live
within admiraldev to stay with the family of
assertion
functions.A developer working on admiralonco implements a new
type of derivation function for adding certain parameters to an oncology
specific ADaM dataset. The new derivation function has one new
assert
custom checking function.
Loose guidelines:
assert
custom checking functions follow a similar
principle - if they can be generalized to other therapeutic areas then
move to admiraldev, whereas if very specific to oncology
needs, then they should remain in admiralonco.